| PREVIOUS PAGE | COVER PAGE | TABLE OF CONTENTS | INDEX | PROBLEMS FOR THIS SECTION | NEXT PAGE |
In mathematics, as in science, there are two general methods by which
we can arrive at new results. One, deduction, involves the assumption of
a set of axioms from which we deduce other statements, called theorems,
according to prescribed rules of logic. This method is essentially that
used in standard courses in Euclidean geometry.
The second method, induction, involves the guessing or discovery of
general patterns from observed data. While in most branches of science
and mathematics the guesses based on induction may remain merely conjectures,
with varying degrees of probability of correctness, certain conjectures
in mathematics which involve the integers frequently can be proved by a
technique of Pascal called mathematical induction. Actually, this technique
in not induction, but is rather an aid in proving conjectures arrived at
by induction.
THE PRINCIPLE OF MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION: A statement concerning positive integers is true for all positive integers if (a) it is true for 1, and (b) its being true for any integer k implies that it is true for the next integer k + 1.
If one replaces (a) by (a'),"it is true for some integer s," then (a') and (b) prove the statement true for all integers greater than or equal to s. Part (a) gives only a starting point; this starting point may be any integer - positive, negative, or zero.
Let us see if mathematical induction is a reasonable method of proof
of a statement involving integers n. Part (a) tells us that the
statement is true for n = 1. Using (b) and the fact that the statement
is true for 1, we obtain the fact that it is true for the next integer
2. Then (b) implies that it is true for 2 + 1 = 3. Continuing in this way,
we would ultimately reach any fixed positive integer.
| PREVIOUS PAGE | COVER PAGE | TABLE OF CONTENTS | INDEX | PROBLEMS FOR THIS SECTION | NEXT PAGE |
Monday, April 27, 1998